Relatives' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Clarity
An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.